The Repressive Function of Administrative Sanctions in the Global Legal Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54200/kt.v5i1.95Keywords:
administrative sanctions, repressive sanctions, theory of administrative sanctions, ne bis in idemAbstract
This study examines the impact of the pan-European legal environment of the European Union on the concept of administrative sanctions and their legal nature. To this end, it outlines the main national starting points and takes stock of the impact of EU jurisprudence on some of them, as well as mapping the main framework of EU legislative activity on administrative sanctions, recent trends in judicial practice in relation to administrative sanctions, and theoretical and doctrinal studies at EU level. On this basis, it summarizes the pan-European influences on administrative sanctions and their theoretical and historical developments with regard to the conceptual elements of administrative sanctions, and formulates a critique of these elements, with particular reference to the repressive function of administrative sanctions.
References
Abbot, C. (2009). The Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008. Legislation and Policy. Environmental Law Review, 11(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1350/enlr.2009.11.1.039
Andrijauskaitė, A. (2022). The Principles of Administrative Punishment under the ECHR. Vilnius University. https://doi.org/10.15388/vu.thesis.408
Árva Zs. (2008). Fejezetek a közigazgatási büntetőbíráskodás elmélettörténete köréből. DELA.
Árva Zs. (2025). The Limits of ne bis in idem in Administrative Matters. Krytyka Prawa, 17(2), megjelenés alatt.
Bailleux, A. (2014). The fiftieth shade of grey Competition law, “criministrative law” and “fairly fair trials”. In F. Galli, & A. Weyembergh (Eds.), Do labels still matter? Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law. The influence of the EU (pp. 137–152). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles. Online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22265
Caeiro, P. (2014). The influence of the EU on the “blurring” between administrative and criminal law. In F. Galli, & A. Weyembergh (Eds.), Do labels still matter? Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law The influence of the EU (pp. 171–190). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles. Online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22265
Datenschutzkonferenz. (2023). Stellungnahme der Konferenz der unabhängigen Datenschutzaufsichtsbehörden des Bundes und der Länder vom 5. Januar 2023. Online: https://shorturl.at/oUKGU
de Moor-van Vugt, A. (2012). Administrative sanctions in EU law. Review of European Administrative Law, 5(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992922
European Committee on Legal Co-operation. (1990). 54th meeting (Strasbourg, 3 - 7 December 1990) - Meeting report. Online: https://shorturl.at/Sq3kh
Galli, F., & Weyembergh, A. (Eds.). (2014). Do labels still matter? Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law The influence of the EU. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles. Online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22265
Iovănaș, E. (2024). Assessment of the Individual Performance of Civivil Servants under the Administrative Code. Journal of Law and Administrative Sciences, 21, 143–159. Online: https://shorturl.at/qN3bP
Jamin, V. (2014). Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law: from the perspective of an EU agency. In F. Galli, & A. Weyembergh (Eds.), Do labels still matter? Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law The influence of the EU (pp. 213–218). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles. Online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22265
Kis N., & Nagy M. (2007). Európai közigazgatási büntetőjog. HVG-Orac.
Kis N. (2018). Az álllami jogérvényesítés és a közigazgatási büntetés dilemmái. Dialóg Campus.
Marcory, R. (2013). Sanctions and Safeguards: The Brave New World of Regulatory Enforcement. Current Legal Problems, 66(1), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut006
Martini, M., Wagner, D., & Wenzel, M. (2018). Das neue Sanktionsregime der DSGVO – ein scharfes Schwert ohne Feinschliff. Verwaltungsarchiv, 109(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1515/verwarch-2018-1090202
Máthé G. (2007). Előszó. In Kis N., & Nagy M. (Szerk.), Európai közigazgatási büntetőjog (pp. 5–6). HVG-Orac.
Nagy M. (2008). Objektíven a közigazgatási objektív felelősségről – az üzembentartó objektív felelőssége apropóján. Közigazgatási Szemle, 2(2), 2–14.
Nagy M. (2019). A közigazgatás szankciórendszere. In Jakab A., Könczöl M., Menyhárd A., & Sulyok G. (Szerk.), Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia (Közigazgatási jog rovat, rovatszerkesztő: Balázs I.). Online: https://shorturl.at/Go1Tx
Paliero, C. E. (2013). The Definition of Administrative Sanctions – General Report. In O. Jansen (Ed.), Administrative Sanctions in the European Union (pp. 1–34). Intersentia.
Roth, R. (2014). Concluding remarks. In F. Galli, & A. Weyembergh (Eds.), Do labels still matter? Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law The influence of the EU (pp. 247–251). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles. Online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22265
Stelkens, U. (2014). The Pan-European General Principles on Administrative Sanctions. Online: https://shorturl.at/AjvXi
Šugman Stubbs, K., & Jager, M. (2014). The organization of administrative and criminal law in national legal systems: exclusion, organized or non-organized co-existence. In F. Galli,& A. Weyembergh (Eds.), Do labels still matter? Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law The influence of the EU (pp. 155–169). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22265
Van den Wyngaert, C. (2001). The protection of the financial interests of the EU in the candidate states. ERA Forum, 2, 2–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02817584
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zsuzsanna Árva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.